|
|
|
|
VIPRE vs. Panda As per PC Antivirus reviews 2010 & 2011 Antivirus Firewall Software Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which Has the Best Real-time Protection?
|
|
VIPRE
|
|
Panda
|
VIPRE's Active Protection is automatically enabled and provides real-time protection for:
- web surfing
- file access
- email
- USB drives
|
|
Panda's "TruPrevent Technologies 2.0" is part of their real-time scanning efforts. While TruPrevent is a solid idea, it has drawbacks, including
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIPRE Antivirus detected and eliminated approximately two thirds of viruses and malware in independent testing.
|
|
Basically, TruPrevent attempts to analyze potential threats and defeat them before they infect your computer.
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining questionable third was correctly labeled for the user to determine what should be done. .
|
|
Precisely why is unclear, but the net result is that the overall real-time scanning of Panda Antivirus is below average.
|
|
|
|
|
RESULT : Advantage VIPRE While Panda does an adequate job, VIPRE provides better real-time protection with a lower system load.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which is Most Effective Against Spyware?
|
|
VIPRE
|
|
Panda
|
|
The antispyware component of VIPRE was formerly sold as their award-winning "CounterSpy" software.
|
|
Panda's overall malware protection is good.
|
|
|
|
|
Now that same antispyware engine is seamlessly integrated as part of VIPRE antivirus.
|
|
Spyware, viruses, trojans, etc. are all treated equally. We like that.
|
|
|
|
|
Both work together to thwart incoming spyware and virus attacks on your PC. .
|
|
When it comes to spyware in particular, Panda's "Anti Malware Engine" kicks-in to defeat most spyware attacks.
|
| Once the initial install is complete, spyware definitions take a few minutes to download. Afterwards, future updates are downloaded much faster. |
|
However, independent testing showed that while Panda detected and deleted most spyware, it wouldn't identify what specific spyware was detected. |
| When it comes to spyware protection, independent testing shows VIPRE to be just as effective against spyware as it is against viruses. |
|
Nor did it give the option to choose if the potential threat should be deleted or not. Full disclosure and choice are always better options. |
|
RESULT: Tie. Both do a good job detecting and removing spyware; however, it wasn't always clear what Panda had removed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which Has the Lowest Resource Usage?
|
|
|
VIPRE
|
|
Panda
|
|
VIPRE antivirus is well known for its low resource usage for good reason.
|
|
Panda antivirus used more than twice the overall PC resources than VIPRE did during a manual scan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During a manual scan, VIPRE's resource usage was less than half that of Panda's.
|
|
CPU usage was about one third more than VIPRE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CPU usage during scanning was approximately one third less than Panda.
|
|
Panda antivirus comes in just under 4% for memory used during real-time protection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memory usage during real-time protection was well beneath 1%.
|
|
While 4% doesn't sound like much, systems with less RAM would see a significantly greater % used during a manual scan. |
|
| Without a doubt, VIPRE is the lightest antivirus software available. |
|
When compared to most other best-selling antivirus programs, Panda is a solid (albeit average) competitor when it comes to resource usage. |
|
|
RESULT: Advantage VIPRE. No other antivirus software that we've seen even comes close to VIPRE when it comes to low resource usage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which Has the Best User Interface?
|
|
VIPRE
|
|
Panda
|
|
VIPRE's user interface is very clean and simple.
|
|
|
The Panda antivirus user interface can be a little confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can quickly and easily see all the information you need on one main screen including
- antivirus settings
- antispyware settings
- last antivirus/spyware scan
- current risk level
- last updates
|
|
|
While the tabs are clearly labeled, we found the section pages took time to figure out what you're supposed to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
After a scan, the results page is easy to understand and labeled clearly.
|
|
|
The "Scan" page is clearly labeled and easy to identify tasks, but other pages didn't seem as intuitive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall, the entire user interface is pleasing, easy to navigate, and simple to understand.
|
|
|
Panda's user interface is certainly not bad, but there are places it could use some improvements in clarity and usability.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
RESULT: Advantage VIPRE. Panda's UI isn't bad, it just isn't as good as it could be.
|
|
|
|
|
Which Has the Best Customer Support?
|
|
VIPRE
|
|
Panda
|
|
It's impossible to say enough about Sunbelt's customer support (Sunbelt is the maker of VIPRE antivirus).
|
|
Panda's customer support still needs some work.
|
|
|
|
|
Their representatives are all US based and responded quickly and professionally to all support concerns.
|
|
They offer the usual knowledge base, FAQ pages, and email support, but they still don't offer phone support to the average 1-license user.
|
|
|
|
|
Sunbelt has an extensive online user guide and knowledge base plus phone, email, and chat support all free with no hidden charges.
|
|
Phone support is only given to those who purchase multiple licenses or their higher-end products.
|
|
|
|
|
Their support links and phone numbers are all very easy to find and not hidden like some of their competition.
|
|
Bottom line: phone support is crucial these days when it comes to antivirus customer care.
|
|
|
|
| It's obvious to us that Sunbelt is eager to give quality customer support. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESULT: Winner VIPRE. Free, easy, US phone support is a huge plus--even if you never use it; Panda simply doesn't have phone support for most customers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which is Easiest to Install?
|
|
VIPRE
|
|
Panda
|
|
The initial VIPRE install is very fast and easy for anyone.
|
|
Like VIPRE, Panda antivirus is easy to install.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The setup wizard walks you through just a few setup steps, and then you're done.
|
|
Also like VIPRE once installed, Panda will ask you to do a full update which can take 10-15 min. This is normal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the install, there is a slight lag time while VIPRE connects to its database and downloads the most current virus and spyware definitions.
|
|
|
Future updates to the antivirus software and of definitions were much quicker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is normal but can take 10-15 min. After that, all future updates are much smaller and download much faster.
|
|
|
Overall, Panda's antivirus should install easily for most users. |
|
|
|
|
|
RESULT: Tie. Both antivirus programs install quickly and easily and can take 10-15 minutes to update both the antivirus engine itself and definitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What's the Best Antivirus Software?
|
|
VIPRE
|
|
Panda
|
If we add up all of the major comparison points, VIPRE easily comes out on top at the best antivirus software this year.
|
|
While Panda Antivirus has improved greatly over its previous year's blunders, the software (and the tech support) still have room to improve, particularly in terms of system resource usage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIPRE Antivirus + Antispyware is very light when running in the background, yet it's still powerful enough to stop viruses and other malware.
|
|
Free phone support is needed for single-license users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The install is easy; the user interface is clear and concise.
|
|
|
Panda antivirus still runs too slowly for our liking.
|
|
|
|
|
| The customer service is excellent, and above all, the antivirus does a fantastic job at identifying, stopping, and destroying all forms of malware including viruses, spyware, trogans, and more. |
|
|
The user interface is good but still needs some clarification and clean-up. We can't call Panda the "best antivirus software," but we can call it "good." If you're already familiar with the Panda brand, it's not a bad choice.
For other consumers, VIPRE will likely be a better choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESULT: Winner VIPRE. While Panda is good antivirus software, it can't beat VIPRE when it comes to efficiency, real-time protection, customer service, and price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which Has the Best Email Virus Protection?
|
|
|
VIPRE
|
|
Panda
|
|
|
VIPRE does a good job when it comes to email virus protection
|
|
Inbound emails are scanned before they hit your inbox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIPRE works with all major email clients, so you should be covered if you're using:
- Microsoft Outlook
- Outlook Express
- Windows Mail
- Other POP3 and SMTP mail clients (Thunderbird, IncrediMail, Eudora, etc.)
- Thunderbird
- IncrediMail
- Eudora
|
|
Panda claims to work with all email programs, and while we don't know of any that don't work, but "all" email clients is a broad claim. Your mileage may vary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| For an antivirus application, VIPRE gets the job done. |
Overall, Panda's inbound email scans were good, though it did take more system resources when large emails were being scanned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESULT: Tie. Both VIPRE and Panda protect your inbox well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|